|
1).
On
the evening of May 6, 1942, the Neosho, in accordance with
instructions from Commander Task Force SEVENTEEN, proceeded on duty
assigned with the U.S.S. Sims as escort, to conform with Commander
Task Force SEVENTEEN Operation Order No. 2-42. The Neosho was
required to pass through a given geographical point, at one hour after
sunrise the following morning, which she proceeded to do. At 0811, May 7,
1942, being in the vicinity of this assigned point and not sighting
any ships of the Task Force operating in that area, the Neosho
proceeded to carry out instructions.
2).
At
0810, May 7, 1942, two planes were observed at a distance of approximately
ten miles, bearing 020° T, but no positive identification could be made
as they were too far away. It was believed at this time that they were
planes from one of our carriers. At 0929, a bomb was seen to fall about
one hundred yards on the starboard quarter of the Sims, having been
dropped from an enemy plane operating singly. The Sims at that time
was patrolling ahead of the Neosho, following a specified zig-zag
plan. This plane disappeared heading in a northerly direction. General
Quarters was immediately sounded. Battle stations were manned continuously
until cessation of the engagement with the enemy at 1218. Speed was
increased to eighteen knots. At 1005, sighted approximately fifteen enemy
planes approaching from 025° T. These planes made no attempt to attack,
but flew parallel to the course of this vessel on the port side at high
altitude, well out of gun range and disappeared to the northeastward. The Sims
opened fire but no bursts were observed. At 1023, seven more enemy planes
approaching from 010° T were sighted. These planes flew parallel to this
vessel on the port side, crossed the bow, and disappeared to the
northeastward, having made no attempt to attack either the Sims or
the Neosho. Sims opened fire shortly after sighting. This
vessel commenced firing three inch guns when these planes were within
range. At 1033, a group of about ten planes approached from 140° T, of
which three planes (twin-engine bombers) commenced a horizontal bombing
attack on this vessel, others proceeding to the northeastward. At 1035,
these three bombers dropped three bombs simultaneously; the direction of
the fall of the bombs was observed closely and the ship was swung hard
right to avoid being hit; all bombs fell to starboard and were near
misses. These three planes were the only planes observed throughout the
entire engagement which were other than single engine.
3).
At
1201, observed approximately twenty-four enemy planes at high altitude,
apparently taking position for dive-bombing attacks on this vessel and the
Sims. From 1201 to 1218, this vessel was subjected to continuous
dive-bombing attacks from all directions. The 20 mm fire of the Neosho
was very effective.
At no time during the engagement did the machine gunners falter at their
jobs, notwithstanding the fact that two men were killed instantly right in
the midst of the forward group, one of them being decapitated by flying
fragments. However, despite any courageous tenacity on the part of the gun
crews, it was quite obvious that if a pilot desired to carry his bomb home,
he could not be stopped. The greatest majority of the planes diving on the Neosho
were forced to deliver their attacks at a high altitude; only three or four
dove to within a few hundred feet of the masts. Although the three inch
fifty caliber anti-aircraft guns fired throughout the attacks it is
difficult to evaluate their effectiveness against the enemy.
4).
The
constant maneuvering of the ship so as to head crosswind, and the
effective fire of the 20 mm guns, is considered responsible for the large
number of near misses. Three enemy planes are definitely known to have
been shot down by this ship, of which one made the suicidal run into Gun
No. 4 enclosure. It is believed that at least four other planes received
sufficient 20 mm hits to render their return to base questionable. Three
planes were observed to swerve away without completing their attack, due
to the effectiveness of the 20 mm gun fire.
5).
Shortly
after the last bomb dropped, the Commanding Officer ordered all hands to
"Prepare to Abandon Ship but not to abandon until so ordered." A
messenger sent by the Executive Officer from aft came to the Commanding
Officer stating that he had been sent to find out what the orders were
regarding abandoning ship. The Commanding Officer told him to tell the
Executive Officer, "Make preparations for abandoning ship and
stand-by." The Commanding Officer had no knowledge of the condition
of the Executive Officer. At about 1230, the Commanding Officer ordered
the two motor whale boats to be lowered to pick up personnel who had
abandoned ship without orders, and to tow all life rafts back to the ship.
All undamaged life rafts, seven in number, had been set adrift without
orders from the bridge. The many attacks delivered by the dive-bombers
were directed at the bridge, and at the after section of the ship
containing the engineering installation. With the exception of the 3"
gun crews in No. 1 and No. 2 gun enclosures and the forward ammunition and
repair parties, all of the ship's personnel were concentrated in these
two sections.
In the immediate vicinity of the bridge, three direct hits and
a number of near misses occurred. In the after part of the ship, two direct
hits, a suicidal dive of a plane, and the blowing up of at least two
boilers, along with several near misses, occurred. It is believed that the
destruction of the escort vessel with no other ships in sight, combined with
the violent shocks from the several bomb hits and near misses, in many cases
rendered personnel incapable of logical thought. It is known that many of
the personnel aft, due to the flame resulting from the suicidal dive, smoke,
and escaping steam, believing they were trapped with the ship sinking,
jumped over the side. The number of men who were critically burned or
injured in the after end of the ship, and who jumped over the side, is not
known. The two motor whale boats placed men on the rafts and took as many in
the boat as the boat officer in each case considered safe. They did not tow
the life rafts back to the ship. When the boats returned to the ship,
without life rafts, and loaded in excess of capacity with survivors, many of
whom were badly injured and severely burned, it was too near sunset to send
them back to attempt to locate, and return with, the drifting life rafts.
The sea was rough and it was the Commanding Officer's opinion, as well as
that of several officers, that the Neosho probably would not stay
afloat throughout the night. The rafts were then out of sight. It was the
Commanding Officer's conviction at that time that one of the Task Forces
with which this vessel was operating would find the Neosho on the
following day, if still afloat, and the rafts would then be located and
occupants thereof rescued. A muster upon return of the boats showed that of
21 officers and 267 men, including passengers, on board at quarters that
morning, 16 officers and 94 men were accounted for, 1 officer and 19 men
were known dead, and 4 officers and 154 men were missing. In addition to the
above, there were 15 enlisted survivors of the Sims. During the
afternoon the wind had increased to force 5-6 and the sea was moderately
rough. In the early afternoon it was difficult to see the life rafts from
the bridge with the aid of binoculars, and the boats were seen only intermittently, prior to their
return.
6).
Shortly
after giving the order to prepare to abandon ship, the Commanding Officer
directed the Communications Officer to destroy all the classified material
in his possession, and proceeded to
destroy all classified material in his own possession. This was done to
prevent any of this material falling into the hands of the enemy. Due to the
above, all subsequent transmissions by radio, using the auxiliary generator,
were sent in plain language.
7).
Immediately
the Neosho listed heavily, a close watch was kept on the
inclinometer in order to detect signs of increased average list with
consequent danger of capsizing. Valves to starboard wing tanks #5, #6, and
#8 were opened to counteract list; valves to #3, #4, and #7, same side,
inoperative due to damage. This vessel, due to the seven bomb hits it
received, was listed at an angle of about 30° and without power, but
remained afloat in a sinking condition until survivors were rescued by the
U.S.S. Henley on May 11, 1942. The U.S.S. Sims, as a result
of hits sustained, broke in two and sank at approximately 1230, May 7,
1942.
8).
The
narrative of the period May 7-11, 1942, is contained in enclosure (A).
When the U.S.S. Henley approached this vessel on May 11, 1942, the
following message was sent by her: "HAVE YOU ANY INSTRUCTIONS FOR ME
X SHIP IS A TOTAL LOSS SETTLING GRADUALLY X WHAT ARE YOUR ORDERS."
The reply received was "EXPEDITE TRANSFER OF SURVIVORS." This
was followed shortly afterward by the flag hoist "EMERG VICTOR."
In view of the foregoing, personnel were transferred as quickly as
possible and not permitted to leave the vicinity of the boats for the
purpose of getting either government or personal equipment. Upon arrival
alongside the Henley in the last boat the Commanding Officer found
that the two Neosho motor whale boats used for transfer of first
group of survivors, had already been scuttled by orders of the Henley,
and he was informed that the Commanding Officer of the Henley's
orders were that no baggage could be brought aboard, that the Henley
had to get underway as soon as possible because of possibility of attack
by the enemy which was concurred in by the Commanding Officer of the Neosho.
All boats had material in them that had been loaded in anticipation of
abandoning ship, and making a protracted voyage to Australia, including
navigational and ordnance equipment.
9).
A
continuous watch was maintained by the Commanding Officer and Gunnery
Officer on the list and trim of the Neosho during the period May
7-11, 1942. Because of the serious damage sustained as the result of bomb
hits in general, and in particular those in the cargo tanks in the
vicinity of the bridge structure where the buckling of the main deck
plating was daily increasing, the Commanding Officer was convinced that
the Neosho was in danger of breaking in two. In addition, the
engineroom, fireroom, and #2 and #3 cargo pump rooms were taking more
water each day. It was felt that it would be but a short time before the Neosho
would sink of her own accord or break in two. Having in mind the above
conditions the Commanding Officer was convinced that the Neosho
could not be salvaged. In view of the above conditions plus the knowledge
that: (a) the Neosho was within range of shore based enemy
aircraft; (b) enemy submarines were operating in the Coral Sea and (c)
that an enemy carrier had been reported not far distant, the Commanding
Officer felt fully justified in directing the sinking of the Neosho.
In addition, it was felt that the Henley's remaining hove-to in the
vicinity to attempt a transfer of equipment from the Neosho would
result in unnecessarily jeopardizing the Henley, as well as the
lives of approximately 400 officers and men on board. The Commanding
Officer of the Neosho therefore asked the Henley to line
aft, to expedite sinking. This request was not fulfilled until the latter
part of the gun firing, when, after a few well placed hits in the after
section, the Neosho quickly settled and sank, stern first, at 1522,
May 11, 1942.
10).
The
search for survivors was conducted as outlined in references (e) and (f).
No survivors were found, and at the conclusion of the search the Neosho
detail was landed at Brisbane, Australia, and reported on board the U.S.S.
Griffin.
11).
The
U.S.S. Helm, which had continued the search after the departure of
the Henley, arrived in Brisbane, Australia, on May 18, 1942. They
had found four survivors on a life raft on May 16, 1942, one of whom died
shortly after being taken aboard. A detailed report of the Helm
search has not been received by the Commanding Officer of the U.S.S. Neosho.
From statements of the three survivors it is known that: (a) they were
part of a group of about 68 men who were
on four life rafts secured together; (b) that the balance of the men had
succumbed as a result of lack of water and exhaustion. The men constituting
this group, as far as can be remembered by the two survivors on board the Wright
at the present time, are indicated in enclosure (F). These survivors stated
that they had seen four planes during the time they were drifting,
consisting of (1) a plane thought to be a "PBY" on May 10, 1942,
quite a distance away; (2) a "PBY" and an Australian
"Hudson" on May 11, 1942, a little closer than (1), and (3) a
"PBY" on May 12, 1942, fairly close, but they had not seen any
ships prior to the arrival of the Helm.
12).
During
and subsequent to the engagement, except for isolated instances, the
performance of duty of all personnel was of the highest order and in
keeping with the traditions of the United States Navy.
13).
Outstanding
cases worthy of commendation and praise are submitted herewith:
FIRTH,
Francis J., Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Navy: - As Executive Officer
of the U.S.S. Neosho, his battle station was in Battle II,
located on the port side aft, just forward of Gun No. 4. When a Japanese
plane made a suicidal dive into Gun No. 4 enclosure, this officer was
knocked down and rendered unconscious by the concussion of the explosion
which occurred, which was immediately followed by an intense fire.
Although badly burned about the face, arms, and hands, and suffering
excruciating pain, this officer's first thought upon regaining
consciousness, when he found the after end of the ship afire, steam
escaping in a dense cloud on the stack deck, and the ship listing badly,
was the safety of the personnel in his vicinity. He despatched a
messenger to the bridge to ascertain the Commanding Officer's wishes
with regard to abandoning ship, and did everything within his power to
disseminate the Commanding Officer's orders to the men in his vicinity.
When his services were no longer required in the after part of the ship
he made his way forward and sometime later, on first meeting with the
Commanding Officer, reported for further duty and asked what assistance
he could render. He did this despite the fact that he was critically
burned about the face, hands, and left arm
.
At
all times on May 7, 1942, and in subsequent days, he was an heroic example
of unselfishness, insisting upon treatment of all other injured personnel
first. Despite his burned condition, he continued to offer his services in
the trying days subsequent to May 7, 1942. His conduct was considered
extraordinarily courageous and outstanding, and in keeping with the
highest ideals and traditions of the naval service. He is recommended for
the highest commendation possible.
BROWN,
Thomas M., Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Navy: - As gunnery Officer of
the U.S.S. Neosho, this officer was stationed in the exposed fire
control tower on the flying bridge. Throughout the engagement, and as long
as an enemy plane was in sight, he maintained an effective fire against
the enemy, as a result of which three enemy planes were definitely
destroyed, and four others are not believed to have returned to their
base. Upon receiving orders to prepare to abandon ship, he saw all
personnel clear of the control tower and flying bridge before leaving
himself. Although believing the ship would list over and sink immediately,
he calmly assisted the Commanding Officer on the bridge in the disposition
of boats, dissemination of orders, and destruction of classified material,
with no thought for his own personal safety. In the days subsequent to the
attack, he assumed and performed the duties of Executive Officer in a
thorough and efficient manner, and was invaluable in making suggestions
for the improvement of conditions on board, and in the final preparations
for abandoning ship. His conspicuous courage and resourcefulness during
the engagement with the enemy, and in time of dire peril and great
responsibility is considered worthy of the highest commendation possible
and he is so recommended. Attention is invited to the Commanding Officer's
commendation of this officer's conduct during the engagement with the
enemy on December 7, 1941.
VERBRUGGE,
Louis, Lieutenant, U.S. Navy: - As Engineer Officer of the U.S.S. Neosho,
this officer was stationed in the main engine room. The engine room was
flooded with fuel oil as a result of a bomb explosion. He remained at his
station endeavoring to continue operation of the main engines, with the
engine room untenable due to smoke from the fire in the bunker fuel oil
tank. When, as a result of a bomb explosion in the fireroom shortly
afterward, all power was lost, he proceeded to make a thorough inspection
of the engineering
spaces as far as possible to determine the extent of the damage sustained,
despite the fact that he knew the ship was in danger of capsizing. In the
days subsequent to the attack he displayed outstanding leadership,
courage, initiative, and ingenuity in overcoming obstacles in connection
with the hoisting out of the port motor launch from its skids, and down
the port side. The ship was without power and listing heavily to
starboard. It was impossible to launch boats on the starboard side as the
seas were breaking heavily and the deck was submerged. He was an
inspiration to the personnel working with him on this difficult task. The
proposed departure from the ship would have been impossible if this boat
had not been available. I sincerely recommend him for a suitable award.
BRATT,
Harold, 305 14 53, Machinists Mate First Class, U.S. Navy: - Extensive
damage was done by one of the bombs when it exploded in the fireroom,
tearing open main and auxiliary steam lines, boiler casings and boiler
tubes. BRATT was in charge of the Watch and Battle Station in the after
engineroom which is located in the compartment underneath the fireroom,
and from which there was no escape except up through the fireroom by way
of vertical ladders and two small hatches in the fireroom deck. BRATT,
assuming the fact that serious damage had occurred in the fireroom and
that the space above the after engineroom was filled with steam, advised
the four men with him of the probable conditions existing in the fireroom
above, and that any attempt to escape would be futile for the time being.
He attempted to restrain two of the men, who insisted on leaving the after
engineroom at once, and who disregarded his instructions to remain on
their stations. In a scuffle which ensued, BRATT was knocked down and into
the bilges, receiving slight bodily injuries, and had the emergency hand
lantern and gas mask he was carrying torn from his hands. By this time the
compartment was in darkness and was slowly filling with sea water. With
sound reasoning, BRATT kept the two remaining men with him in the after
engineroom for approximately three-quarters of an hour, thus permitting
adequate time to elapse for sufficient steam to escape from the fireroom
above to make escape possible. He had the two men follow his example of
wrapping wiping rags about their hands and arms, putting on gas masks, and
then led them up the after escape hatch into the fireroom and thence to
the topside.
BRATT's
correct assumption of existing conditions, leadership, quick thinking and
action under most difficult circumstances resulted in saving the lives of
the two men under his charge, as well as his own. The two men who
disregarded his instructions and attempted an early escape, were overcome
by hot steam and died in the fireroom.
He
is recommended for the highest commendation possible, and advancement to
Chief Machinists Mate.
SIMMONS,
Wayne, 368 41 71, Machinists Mate Second Class, U.S. Navy: - One of
the bombs exploded adjacent to a large fuel oil tank located over the
forward part of the engineroom. The explosions ruptured the bottom of the
fuel oil tank directly over the two main feed pumps covering two men on
watch with fuel oil so badly that they could no longer see. They staggered
away from the pumps and were assisted out of the engineroom. Without
orders, SIMMONS shifted from his battle station, which was the starboard
main circulating pump and starboard main drain valve located on the same
level as the main feed pumps, but clear of the fuel oil pouring down upon
the feed pumps, and took over throttle operation of the operating feed
pump in order that water supply to boilers would not be impaired. In spite
of heavy black oil smoke filling the space, SIMMONS remained at the
operating feed pump throttle station until a bomb explosion in the
fireroom ruptured steam lines and cut off steam supply to all machinery.
SIMMONS's
quick action, fearlessness, courage, and devotion to duty resulted in the
maintenance of feed water supply to all of the ship's boilers then
steaming under full power conditions right up to the moment when the bomb
explosion in the fireroom totally disabled the boilers and main steam
lines.
He
is recommended for the highest commendation possible, and advancement to
Machinists Mate First Class.
PETERSON,
Oscar Vernon, 341 15 75, Chief Watertender (permanent appointment) U.S.
Navy (deceased): - Extensive damage was done in the fireroom by
one of the bombs which tore open main and auxiliary steam lines, boiler
casings and tubes.
PETERSON
was in charge of the repair party stationed in the crew's mess compartment
adjacent to the upper level of the fireroom, with the additional specific
duty of closing the four main steam line bulkhead stop valves during the
battle, should damage dictate the need for shutting down these valves.
When
the bomb exploded in the fireroom the iron door leading from the fireroom
to the mess compartment was torn open and the force of the explosion from
the bomb, steam lines and boilers knocked PETERSON down and burned his
face and hands. In spite of noises indicating further damage being done by
bombs to other parts of the ship, personal injury and lack of assistance
because of serious injury to other men in his repair party, PETERSON
worked his way into the fireroom trunk over the forward end of the two
forward boilers, when escaping steam had dissipated sufficiently to permit
him to reach the bulkhead stop valves, and closed these valves. By so
doing, he received additional severe burns about his head, arms and legs,
which resulted in his death on May 13, 1942.
The
Commanding Officer considers PETERSON's conduct to have shown the highest
qualities of devotion to duty, courage and outstanding superior qualities
most desired in a leading Chief Petty Officer, and he is recommended for a
posthumous award of the highest order.
HOAG,
Robert W., 227 94 39, Chief Pharmicists Mate (permanent appointment), U.S.
Navy: - In the absence of the Medical Officer, who is among those
missing, HOAG, assisted by WARD, W.J., PhM1c, V-6, USNR., was unceasing in
his administration of assistance to the injured. The lives of those now
recovering were undoubtedly saved by HOAG's ability, energy and care.
Particular attention is invited to enclosure (J), submitted to the
Commanding Officer by the Medical Officer of the U.S.S. Henley.
Similar statements have been made by the Medical Officer of the U.S.S. Griffin,
and the U.S. Army medical authorities in Brisbane, Australia, who took charge
of the injured personnel upon arrival. HOAG's performance of duty was
particularly outstanding when it is considered that he was working in the
open, on a listed ship, without adequate equipment, and surrounded by fuel
oil and contamination. His skill, resourcefulness, untiring efforts,
constant vigilance, and cheerful giving of himself without rest resulted
in keeping the injured personnel alive and comfortable until they were
turned over to the Medical Officer of the U.S.S. Henley for
treatment.
He
is recommended for the highest commendation and advancement to warrant
rank.
WARD,
William J., 407 47 54, Pharmacists Mate First Class, V-6, U.S. Naval
Reserve: - In the absence of the Medical Officer, who is among those
missing, WARD, was unceasing in his administration of assistance to the
injured. The lives of those now recovering were undoubtedly saved by
WARD's ability, energy and care. Particular attention is invited to
enclosure (J), submitted by the Medical Officer of the U.S.S. Henley.
Similar statements have been made by the Medical Officer of the U.S.S. Griffin,
and the U.S. Army medical authorities in Brisbane, Australia, who took
charge of the injured personnel upon arrival. WARD's performance of duty
was particularly outstanding when it is considered that he was working in
the open, on a listed ship, without adequate equipment, and surrounded by
fuel oil and contamination. His skill, resourcefulness, untiring efforts,
constant vigilance, and cheerful giving of himself without rest resulted
in keeping the injured personnel alive and comfortable until they were
turned over to the Medical Officer of the U.S.S. Henley for
treatment.
He
is recommended for the highest commendation and advancement to Chief
Pharmacists Mate (acting appointment) V-6, U.S. Naval Reserve.
14). The
following personnel are commended for their exemplary behavior,
initiative, resourcefulness, and untiring obedience in the days subsequent
to the attack, 7-11 May, 1942, and are recommended for advancement or
promotion as indicated:
|
Lieutenant (jg) Charles C. COOK, E-M, United States Naval Reserve. |
|
Lieutenant (jg) Estul F. NESSMITH, E-M, United States Naval Reserve. |
|
Ensign Leonard F. GEARIN, D-M, United States Naval Reserve - to
Lieutenant, junior grade. |
|
Ensign Kenneth S. TERRILL, D-M, United States Naval Reserve - to
Lieutenant, junior grade. |
|
Ensign Posey N. HOWELL, SC-V(G), United States Naval Reserve. |
|
Chief Machinist Uriel H. LEACH, United States Navy. |
|
Boatswain Vernon R. MANNERS, United States Navy. |
|
BAGWELL, Harold C., 262 32 96, M.Smith2c, U.S. Navy, for advancement to
Metalsmith First Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
BOEHM, Robert T., 223 51 33, Shipfitter Second Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Shipfitter First Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
BOYNTON, William D., 383 08 04, Seaman Second Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Seaman First Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
DICKEN, R.J., Service Number Unknown, Chief Signalman (acting appointment)
U.S. Navy, (Sims), for advancement to Boatswain, U.S. Navy. |
|
EBBERT, Meredith E., 393 49 16, Seaman First Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Coxswain, U.S. Navy. |
|
HAGEWOOD, Charles A., 360 38 90, Seaman First Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Coxswain, U.S. Navy. |
|
JACKSON, Patrick J., 268 10 53, Boatswain's
Mate First Class, U.S. Navy, for advancement to Chief Boatswain's Mate
(acting appointment), U.S. Navy. |
|
LEDFORD, Robert, 372 14 57, Seaman First Class, U.S. Navy, for advancement
to Coxswain, U.S. Navy. |
|
MARCHESE, Nicholas G., 223 01 56, Ship's Cook Second Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Ship's Cook First Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
McPHERSON, Arthur R., 283 41 18, Seaman Second Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Seaman First Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
O'GRADY, Gilbert M., 409 12 95, O-1, United States Naval Reserve, for
advancement to Coxswain, O-1, United States Naval Reserve. |
|
PALOMA, Leopoldo, 152 15 24, Officer's Stweard First Class, Class F-4-D,
United States Fleet Reserve. |
|
PARKER, Thomas J., 243 10 04, Boatswain's Mate First Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Chief Boatswain's Mate (acting appointment), U.S. Navy. |
|
PARKER, William S., 287 01 41, Chief Radioman (acting appointment), U.S.
Navy, for advancement to Radio Electrician, U.S. Navy. |
|
PEROWITZ, Walter J., 336 34 34, Chief Machinist's Mate (permanent
appointment), U.S. Navy, for advancement to Machinist, U.S. Navy. |
|
PUPKIN, Alex, 359 78 28, Yeoman First Class, U.S. Navy, for advancement to
Chief Yeoman (acting appointment), U.S. Navy. |
|
ROMANOFSKY, William, 207 23 13, Storekeeper Second Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Storekeeper First Class, U. S. Navy. |
|
SHEA, Francis J., 191 84 27, Chief Gunner's Mate (permanent appointment),
Class F-4-D, U.S. Fleet Reserve. |
|
SMITH, Addison F., 382 19 51, Quartermaster Third Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Quartermaster Second Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
STOVALL, Wilbern L., 336 36 07, Chief Boatswain's Mate (permanent
appointment), U.S. Navy, for advancement to Boatswain, U.S. Navy. |
|
TYNER, Lorenzo, 272 07 36, Officer's Cook Second Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Officer's Cook First Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
WATCHLER, James L., 250 49 86, Coxwain, U.S. Navy, for advancement to
Boatswain's Mate Second Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
WEBER, James M., 360 04 30, Quartermaster Second Class, U.S. Navy, for
advancement to Quartermaster First Class, U.S. Navy. |
|
WOBRELL, Ernest W., 233 97 76, Chief Electrician's Mate (acting
appointment), U.S. Navy, for advancement to Electrician, U.S. Navy. |
|
WORTHAM, John H., Jr., 224 30 32, Mess Attendant Second Class, U.S. Navy,
for advancement to Mess Attendant First Class, U.S. Navy. |
15).
The
Commanding Officer is constrained to censure the following officers whose
performance of duty contributed to unnecessary confusion, made the search
for survivors uncertain, and detracted from what was otherwise a glorious
achievement in the history of the United States Navy:
BRADFORD,
Henry K., Lieutenant, D-M, U.S. Naval Reserve:
a).
This
officer, at 1123 on May 7, 1942, in a lull in the engagement, acting
in his capacity as Navigator, plotted a fix of the sun and Venus in
an incorrect manner, and entered the result in
his Navigation Work Book as Latitude 16°-25'S; Longitude 157°-31'E. As
a result of this error, the proper point of commencement of search for
survivors was not used, and the error was not discovered until
subsequent replotting by the Commanding Officer, which showed the
correct position to be Latitude 16°-09'S; Longitude 158°- 03'E. (See
attachment of this officer dated May 19, 1942.
b).
As
Officer-of-the-Deck, this officer left the bridge without authority
from the Commanding Officer, and, although he knew the order given was
"Prepare to abandon ship," he dove over the side, thereby
setting a bad example. (See statement of this officer dated May 22,
1942).
With
reference to the statement of Lieutenant BRADFORD dated May 22, 1942,
the Commanding Officer apologized to Lieutenant BRADFORD only for
having criticized his actions after getting into the water; he in no
way condoned Lieutenant BRADFORD's dereliction of duty as outlined
above.
DRISCOLL,
William G., Lieutenant (jg), D-M, U.S. Naval Reserve: -
When contact with the enemy was made, the Commanding Officer directed this
officer, as Communication Officer, to send out contact reports and to
obtain correct positions for them from the Navigator. The contact reports,
and subsequent reports of this vessel's position when sinking, were not
despatched correctly, nor was the proper record kept of traffic cleared,
during and after the engagement. His conduct under fire is questionable.
He did not display the qualities of a leader, and did not inspire courage
or confidence in those who came in contact with him. (See statement dated
May 19, 1942).
The
"verbal commendation" referred to by this officer in paragraph
(1) of his statement consisted of a talk in the course of which he was
informed by the Commanding Officer that he
was stubborn and non-cooperative, and that he had to stop being a weakling
and leaning on an enlisted man, to wit: - PARKER, W.S., C.R.M., U.S. Navy,
and that he should at least make an attempt to appear courageous even
though inwardly frightened.
HARGIS,
Robert N., Ensign, D-M, U.S. Naval Reserve: -
This officer, as Assistant Gunnery Officer, was in telephonic
communication with the 3" guns. He failed to pass the word
"Prepare to Abandon Ship," as given by the Gunnery Officer.
Although assigned to Life Raft No. 4, he failed to take charge of
personnel in that station, and did not prevent them from throwing over the
life raft, nor from jumping in the water. He manned No. 2 Motor Whale Boat
instead and commenced lowering the boat. The Gunnery Officer stopped the
boat at the upper deck level, and, acting upon direct orders from the
Commanding Officer, ordered the boat lowered to the water to pick up
survivors in the water, and to tow all life rafts back to the ship. He
failed to tow any life rafts back to the ship, and did not do his utmost
to rescue survivors. (See statement dated May 20, 1942).
Inasmuch
as these three officers volunteered their services for active duty long
before the entry of the United States in the present war, thereby showing
a laudable intention, that they all conducted themselves in a creditable
manner in the face of the enemy at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and
that they, as well as all other personnel on board, were subjected to a
terrific and continuous attack by dive-bombers, with concurrent shock and
numbing of faculties, the Commanding Officer feels that the best interests
of the Navy will be served by not recommending them for Court-Martials.
Appropriate comments will be made on the fitness reports of the three
officers concerned.
16).
The
following recommendations are submitted:
a).
That
all life rafts be painted yellow, and provided with a tarpaulin which
can be quickly slipped off; tarpaulin to be painted the color of the
surrounding structure. The Neosho life rafts were painted grey
and were extremely difficult for the men in the water, and personnel
on board ship, or for searching ships or aircraft, to locate in the
water.
b).
That
all life rafts be provided with a telescopic stick, similar to a fishing
rod, of sufficient strength to permit a flag to be bent on the top, to
assist men in the water, and searching boats, ships and aircraft, to
locate the raft.
c).
That
all ship's boats be fitted for sail, and that a mast, spars, canvas and
running tackle be provided in the boat.
d).
That
the words "ABANDON SHIP" be deleted from all preliminary
orders given; that the preliminary order be "FALL IN AT (or MAN)
BOAT AND RAFT STATIONS," and that the words "ABANDON
SHIP" be used only when it is desired to accomplish just that,
namely, for all personnel to leave the ship.
17).
The
Neosho detail left Brisbane, Australia, on May 23, 1942, in
accordance with the orders of Commander Task Force FORTY-TWO, and reported
aboard U.S.S. Wright, at Sydney, Australia, on May 24, 1942.
JOHN
S. PHILLIPS.
|
Copy
to:
|
ComSqdRon
EIGHT
|
|
|
ComSerFor
17.
|
|